If it comes with a fully functional treadle I'ld pay no more than 150 USD, if the stand is with the clutch motor only I would'nt pay more than 100 USD. I think 600 Dollars should get you a better machine or the Pfaff 28 should be way cheaper. It was designed to make purses ore similar stuff. So essentially you would be buying 19th century technology comparable to the well documented Singer 17. As far as I can tell from photos and scanned sales brochures Pfaff modernized the castings to accommodate for changing tastes but didn't do much to the internal machanics. Later Pfaff came up with the couples 25/26 and 27/28. Actually, when I bought it, its acessory-box contained Singer and Pfaff parts all mixed up. It is so close a copy to the Singer 17 including subclasses and the quirky external reverse leverage that I believe you can swap parts. The usual suspects copied this design: Adler 47 and 48, Pfaff 23 and 24. Singer made them in pairs: The Singer 17 being the usual rightstanding machine, the Singer 18 being a mirrored copy standing on the left side of the table. If I don't mix things up the Pfaff 28 goes back to the Singer 17. I would only buy it if it is available for next to nothing or if you know exactly why and how a Pfaff 28 is the solution for one of your sewing problems. I think the Pfaff 28 is a totally outdated piece of equipment with very limited use. Sometimes I get the impression that prices in Germany and the USA differ by a factor of 4. It's the machine worth the $600 the seller is asking ? I tried to Google needles for Pfaff 28 but I couldn't find anything.nothing on EBay either.same goes for bobbins.

For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation.Thanks ! The machine has the clutch motor that I will probably end up replacing with a servo if I am gonna end up buying.

You should also add the template to the talk page.

A model attribution edit summary Content in this edit is translated from the existing German Wikipedia article at ] see its history for attribution.

You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation.

If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.

Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality.Consider adding a topic to this template: there are already 6,578 articles in the main category, and specifying |topic= will aid in categorization.Machine translation like DeepL or Google Translate is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia.View a machine-translated version of the German article.

Pfaff 332 review